I know the title strikes you as absurd. How could a little old white-haired lady with wire-framed glasses perched on the tip of her nose and a perpetual sour look on her face be our last line of defense? Defense against what you might ask. All those who dare to speak above an audible whisper in a public place filled to the brim with dusty tomes. But the truth is even stranger than that.
With The Patriot Act’s numerous amendments in a post 9-11 world, the presidential re-election of George W. Bush, the over-due stay of American troops in Iraq, and the Christian religious right working over-time to destroy the separation of church and state and abolish the Bill of Rights which guarantees freedom of expression to all of its citizens, the library may be the last place you think needs defending, but nothing could be farther from the truth. The “thought police” are on the prowl at your local public school library and if certain books on the shelves don’t meet their guidelines then they could be permanently discarded from the library’s collection.
Banning books is not a new phenomenon but in the past it has usually been undertaken by overly protective parents one book, one public school at a time as parents see fit depending on their moral and social outlook . In the past some of the titles parents attempted to obliterate were classics such as Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye, J.D. Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye, and most recently in 2004 “The Chocolate War for sexual content, offensive language, religious viewpoint, being unsuited to age group and violence” (See American Library Association’s Banned Books List 2004).
Now at the dawn of the Technological Age where unlimited amounts of information are at many adolescents’ fingertips with cell phones, I-pods, PDAS, laptops, and the Internet, the entire Alabama public school library system is under siege and not just one book is about to be thrown in the fire but a whole slew of them. In April in the Alabama state legislature, Republican lawmaker Gerald Allen attempted to pass a bill that stated “public school libraries could no longer buy new copies of plays or books by gay authors, or about gay characters” (“Alabama Bill Targets Gay Authors. April 27, 2005. CBS News).
At first the enormity of this concept is easily missed in the wake of a presidential election that was more about moral issues than social or economic ones, but when seen in a larger context this bill is a warning to all those who would take their “inalienable rights” for granted. If books with gay characters should be taken out of public school libraries why not take out books that depict people engaging in other “immoral” activities such as smoking, drinking, or pre-martial sex. Perhaps that sounds good to you.
But what if they also took out books that had black characters in them or books that had Nazi characters in them. Where would the line be drawn and who would draw it? And once drawn what would the citizens who pay taxes like you and who wanted to read those banned books do now? Now just who would the public school library be catering to—its heterosexual students, its Christian students, its Jewish students or its Anglo-Saxon students?
On an even deeper level, what would happen to American literature if only certain topics could be written about? Only those characters with “upstanding” lives be depicted. Only those plots with happy endings be created. Only those stories set in middle class suburbia where there is a Nuclear Family with a house with a white picket fence and a dog named Spot be told.
The library as a public place is a true testament to the democracy of America and its attempt to allow its citizens free access to all kinds of information from technical to educational to everything in between. While you may not agree with all of the viewpoints displayed in the books the library carries, their guaranteed presence in the library allows all citizens regardless of their race, religion, creed, ethnicity, age, education level, or political bent to find the information that they are looking for.
If you aren’t a frequent visitor to your library I suggest you start now. If you aren’t a Friend at your public library I suggest you join now and voice your views about reader rights, censorship, and freedom of speech or very soon there may be a fire truck coming to your house and they won’t be there to put out a fire but to start one—to burn up every last book you own. If you don’t believe me ask Ray Bradbury. Does art imitate life or what?
American Library Association's Library Bill of Rights
http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/statementspols/statementsif/librarybillrights.htm